The Hearing Blog

March 13, 2012

Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder Conference 2012

Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders Conference, All Children's  Hospital, St Pete, Florida

We’ll be live blogging from the upcoming Conference on the Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders (ANSD), hosted by USF Professor Charles Berlin and Vanderbilt Professor Linda Hood, this Thursday through Saturday March 15th through 17th at All Children’s [sic] Hospital in St Petersburg, Florida.

Topics covered include:
• Results and Outcomes from more than 500 ANSD Patients
• Hearing Aids vs. Cochlear Implants
• Cortical Evoked Potentials
• Newest Developments in Trans-Tympanic ECochG
• Speech Language Management

You can follow developments on Twitter by using the #ANSD hashtag & by following @ANSD2012

On the docket are the following sessions: Just click the links below for the separate blog entries, as they become available…
Thursday:
• The Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentation of Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-Synchrony, by Charles Berlin PhD
• Hyperbilirubinemia and Bilirubin Induced Neurological Disease (BIND), by Steven Shapiro MD
• Sample Case Presentations and Discussions, by Courtney Oliszewski AuD, Sybil Faylo AuD & Bridget Rickman AuD
• Differentiating ANSD from Central Auditory Processing Disorders and the Use of Cortical Evoked Potentials in ANSD, by Thierry Morlet PhD
    For more on cortical potentials as discussed, please see Cortical Reorganization and Cross-Modal Plasticity in Children with Cochlear Implants: Clinical Implications by Dr Anu Sharma
• Cochlear Implants in Infants & Children with ANSD, by Kirsty Gardner-Berry PhD
    [Kirsty is coming all the way from Sydney Cochlear Implant Center, and we are looking forward to hearing her views on the Nucleus vs HiRes 90k vs i100 implant circuits.]

Friday:
• Genetics of Hearing Loss in General and auditory neuropathy/auditory dyssynchrony (AN/AD) in Particular, by Melissa Crenshaw MD
• Hands-on Practice Session in Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Testing, by Kathy Slifer AuD
    [We're looking forward to this one, and will have pictures.]
• Pediatric Grand Rounds: Hyperbilirubinemia, by Steven Shapiro MD
• Variation in Detection and Discrimination Abilities in AN/AD: Implications for Management; by Linda Hood PhD
• Managing Infants with ANSD During the First 12 Months of Life – Let’s Not Just “Wait & See,” by Kirsty Gardner-Berry PhD

Saturday:
• The All Children’s Hospital Cochlear Implantation Process, Selection and Management, by Peter Orobello MD, Kathleen Wasylik MD, Anne Oliver MA, & Shelly Ash MS
• Hearing Aids, vs. Monaural vs. Binaural Cochlear Implantation Results in Speech and Language Acquisition, by Susan Spirakis AuD
    [We're looking forward to this one too, and will have questions regarding differing findings from Mike Dorman & his bimodal studies.]
• Little Patient, Big Doctor: My Journey and Experiences with Big Doctors vs Children as Patients, by Haleh Rabizadeh-Resnick JD
    [Haleh was the subject of the controversial report   Don't let a doctor destroy your baby's hearing on CNN]

   

March 10, 2012

Dangerous new young adult trend on hearing loss vs technology

Filed under: Education,Teenage hearing loss,Uncategorized — Tags: — Dan Schwartz @ 9:39 am

 

Update: The New York Times weighs in with a front page story (more below)

We’ve known for decades that loud music causes permanent, irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, and since time immemorial teens have always had a sense of invincibility.

However, there’s a very important — And dangerous — new trend we’re seeing with today’s youth: Watch this video produced by high schoolers, paying close  attention to the boy at 0:58 & girl at 1:18. You’ll see that these two teens have the attitude that “technology will fix the problem” …And that they are somewhat correct.

 

When you look at what these kids see in their daily lives, with the sophisticated technology in their latest iPhones, software, cars, and medical devices such as Bluetooth-enabled hearing aids, their optimism of technology addressing noise-induced hearing loss is not irrational — And that perception is causing teen deafness at an alarming rate, with the latest studies showing an increase from 14.9% in 1994 to 19.5% — That’s one in five – by 2006, according to this robust study in JAMA.

Hat tip to Mimosa Acoustics for pointing out this surprisingly insightful video, originally published here.

July 28, 2012 UPDATE: The New York Times weighs in with Working or Playing Indoors, New Yorkers Face an Unabated Roar:

The New York Times published an excellent front page story on July 19th on the causes and effects of recreational noise in the Big Apple, such as in restaurants, gyms, clubs, and with iPods. This well-researched article follows up on the excellent February 2010 story in the Wall Street Journal titled Pass the salt… and a Megaphone, which detailed why restaurant designers and managers are using “New Design Styles, High Ceilings and Hardwood Floors [which] Are Making Restaurants Noisier;” with the NY Times story connecting the dots between these noisy new venues and noise-induced hearing loss.

On page two of the online NYT article, we find another example of this dangerous new trend that “technology will fix it” in this quote:

One waiter at Lavo, who, like several other workers, did not want his name published for fear of losing his job, said he knew his hearing could be in jeopardy. But, he reasoned, slight hearing loss was inevitable, since he had also played in a band. “When it happens, it happens,” he shrugged. “Hopefully by that time they’ll have better fixes for it.”

Just how bad is the recreational noise level at Lavo, at 39 East 58th in Midtown Manhattan? Check out these first three paragraphs of the NYT story:

The waitress’s lips were moving but nothing seemed to be coming out. Hundreds of voices swallowed her words as a D.J. pumped out a ticka ticka of dance beats. The happy hour-fueled din rose with it, amplified by tin ceilings and tiled walls.

“I’ve been getting migraines,” the waitress shouted on a recent Thursday night, leaning in to be heard. She said that she woke up with her ears buzzing, and that her doctor had recently prescribed seizure medicine: “It decreases the amount of headaches you get.”

The restaurant, Lavo in Midtown Manhattan, is not just loud but often dangerously so. On that night, the noise averaged 96 decibels over the course of an hour, as loud as a power mower, and a level to which, by government standards, workers should not be exposed for more than three and a half hours without protection for their hearing.

 

September 26, 2011

New Research Shows Listening And Hearing Is Different For Children With Cochlear Implants

Cochlear implants allow profoundly deaf infants to hear speech, which, with proper auditory therapy, allows them to learn spoken language. However, this new study from cognitive psychologist Derek M Houston, PhD, associate professor of otolaryngology at Indiana University School of Medicine shows that the children receiving the implants don’t automatically know how to listen when people speak to them.

Research presented at the recent Acoustical Society of America research meeting showed that deaf babies with cochlear implants spent the same amount of time “listening” as normal-hearing infants of the same age. However, these children with implants spent less time listening than younger normal-hearing infants who had the same amount of hearing experience. Dr Houston said,

When infants are born deaf, their development is shaped by a silent world.  They learn to tune into the sights, smells, and touches that are relevant to them in their environment – but not the sounds. When they receive a cochlear implant, their world changes and is filled with sounds.  But for these infants who have already begun to adapt to their silent environment, sounds may not – at least at first – be perceived as relevant to them.

It has been well-established that infants will look longer at a simple display – the checkerboard pattern – when hearing something they are interested in.   I measured their ‘looking time’ at the pattern when it was paired with a repeating speech sound, and compared that to the looking time at the same pattern with no sound.

Houstons’ research revealed children with cochlear implants spent less time looking at the checkerboard pattern than children who could hear from birth. In addition, two years after implantation, children who were less attentive to speech early-on performed more poorly on a word recognition task. In other words, these infants and toddlers may hear the sounds around them, but not have any motivation to focus on them, which slows their ability to learn speech… And this can be traced for years through word recognition testing.

Furthermore, this research goes towards explaining why prelingually deafened children and adults have not developed a sense of danger to environmental warning signals: For example, they may hear a car horn while crossing a street, but it does not register in their brain properly, i.e. it does not trigger the instinctive danger reflex.

An abstract of Dr Houstons’ research is available at http://asa.aip.org/web2/asa/abstracts/search.may11/asa220.html

Short Link to this story: http://wp.me/p1mNFo-7c

Original source: Listening and Hearing, Not the Same for Children with Cochlear Implants







August 10, 2011

Less-than-honest NBC Today segment on hearing loss

Filed under: Education,NBC Today,Shelley Borgia AuD,Uncategorized — Dan Schwartz @ 2:00 pm

As an RCA Engineering alumnus, I’ve always had a soft spot for their NBC Division; and this sentimentality still exists to this day, even though Comcast now is the owner. Imagine my delight when my friend & crack Audiologist Dr A U Bankaitis posted this clip of a seven-plus minute segment on this mornings’ NBC Today show featuring an interview by Matt Lauer of hearing loss sufferer Jim McDade & his Audiologist Dr Shelley Borgia (e-mail) of Park Avenue Acoustics; and also of Lauer getting his hearing tested by her; and finally a “dog and pony” show of the various hearing instruments on the market:

 

…And much to NBC’s credit, the video is fully captioned: Thank you.

But, as I listened to it, something struck me a bit odd: Listen carefully to McDade speak in this clip:

 

 

Does something sound a little out-of-whack to you, too? Here is what was said:

Matt Lauer: 39-year-old Jim McDade is a true child of the 80′s growing up with headphones.

Jim McDade: I would wake up in the morning and my ears would be throbbing.

but compare it to his speech formation. Something smells a bit ripe to you too now, doesn’t it?

Perhaps the answer is in this next clip, starting at 6:20. Turn on the captions so you can follow the exact dialog:

From the transcript:

Matt Lauer: These are a little larger over here?

Shelley Borgia: These are the older traditional hearing devices.

ML: That made him cringe.

SB: Yes.

ML: Those are the ones that worried you?

Jim McDade: I had to grow up in grade school with something like that [Emphasis added].

Whoa! Looks like we caught Jim McDade and Dr Shelley Borgia being a bit less-than-truthful about the cause of his (McDades’) deafness: Although the “Advocacy Journalism” message of the NBC Today segment is that loud headphone usage can lead to hearing loss — And it certainly can; and may in fact have exacerbated his deafness – there is more to the story, with his childhood hearing loss significant enough to both require his need for hearing aids .AND. affect his speech production.

What makes this segment less-than honest is that, except for the slight speech impediment and McDades’ offhand admission of wearing hearing aids in grade school, we would have never known the cause of his problems is not as advertised. I’ll give Matt Lauer a pass on this, as he is neither an expert; and also maybe his “crap detector” had been been turned down a bit because he’s dealing with the identification of his own mild hearing loss.

On the other hand, I fault both Borgia and McDade for their less-than fully truthful, agenda-driven statements, as when pertinent facts to a story are withheld, the issue of iPod-induced hearing damage loses credibility; and for this they should both be reprimanded.

Shelley Borgia, AuD, of Park Avenue Acoustics in NYC
Audiologist Shelley Borgia, AuD, of Park Avenue Acoustics in NYC, who was less-than 100% truthful in her appearance on NBC Today

 


 

As a side note, there may indeed be a real issue of McDade not wanting to show he wears hearing aids: Perhaps he was teased & bullied when he wore them in grade school, as kids can be merciless, especially on the playground. Fortunately, in the last several years, I’ve been receiving anecdotal reports that this has subsided; and in fact we are seeing more and more kids strutting their ear hardware, as you can see from this photo gallery I’ve assembled.

 

July 5, 2011

Please Don’t Use Sarcasm With My Students: Guest article by (e

Filed under: Education,Relationships,Uncategorized — Dan Schwartz @ 2:26 pm

July 5th Update: Footnote added on the interrelated subjects of bluffing, “tuning out” and late afternoon exhaustion.

We at The Hearing Blog do not pretend to have a corner on the market when it comes to Hearing & Deafness issues; so when a particularly good article comes along, we request of the author permission to reprint it in its’ entirety, as we did with Lost in Music Trivia.

Today, it is our pleasure to present Please Don’t Use Sarcasm With My Students, written by my friend (e


Please Don’t Use Sarcasm With My Students

I wish some teachers and school staff members would stop using negative sarcasm with some of my deaf and hard of hearing students. Sarcasm can sometimes be confusing. Some of my students are not sure how to respond because they may not know if the person is being serious or not. It can be hard for deaf and hard of hearing people to hear the slight difference between a sarcastic tone and a serious one. Many rely on facial expression and if the person says something harsh but is smiling, we may assume that he or she is being sarcastic. But, not everyone express sarcasm or seriousness in the same ways. It can be hard to tell if the person is being sarcastic especially if you are unable to hear the tone of their voice.

I think that when sarcasm is being used with some students, it would be helpful for the person to explain to the students that they are being sarcastic. People should be careful with how they use sarcasm with students. Lighthearted sarcasm is fine, if used in moderation, but negative sarcasm or sarcasm used to put down the student is not all right, in my opinion.

Negative sarcasm can be hurtful and embarrassing. For example, if I were to state the obvious, I think it would be rude if someone I work with were to sarcastically tell me, “Really, Einstein?”

I remember as a child I thought one of my teachers was being sarcastic and I laughed thinking she was only joking. She got angry and acted as if I insulted her, because it turned out she was not being sarcastic. That was a very uncomfortable situation.

e)


Footnote: While we’re on the subject of trying to help our normally-hearing friends understand what it’s like to be hearing impaired, our friend e) has written another superb article titled Eh? What? Huh? What’s That? Come Again? Wait–What? that also merits reading, along with this authors’ comment and e)s’ reply.

June 25, 2011

Smashing Success: HLAA Convention 2011

This past Thursday afternoon to Sunday morning the annual Hearing Loss Association of America Convention was at the Hyatt Regency in the Crystal City section of Arlington, just outside of DC… And it was a smashing success, with over 1200 people preregistered, and hundreds more walk-up for free Expo Hall passes and on-site registration, making it the largest HLAA Convention in history.

All of the HLAA workshop classes provide ASHA & AAA CEU’s; and the two I attended on Saturday were chock full of information needed by hearing healthcare providers of all stripes:

Hearing Aid Compatibility in the 21st Century was led by Senior Group Manager for Accessibility Tony Jasionowski of Panasonic and Senior Engineer Al Baum from Uniden. Al, who is active both in IEEE¹ and TIA², spared no engineering detail explaining TIA-1083 — Telephone Terminal Equipment Handset Magnetic Measurement Procedures and Performance Requirements. Yes, it’s a mouthful; but for us Engineers (and for hearing aid dispensers & audiologists) it’s a G-dsend, as it lays out on which two orthogonal axes as well as the magnetic field strength scalar quantities new phones must supply to hearing aid telecoils.

What makes TIA-1083 so nice is that it addressed the problem we Hearing Aid dispensers & users had with 1A2 POTS compatibility with  the vertical T-coils found in BTE instruments, as well as the vertical T-coils glued to the faceplate of ITE’s by some manufacturers. As someone who has worked in the trenches as a retail hearing aid dispenser, nothing was more frustrating than taking the calls from irate patients (legitimately) complaining that they couldn’t hear on the phone, especially with BTE’s. HLAA’s Lise Hamlin & others cooperated with TIA to make this specification work… And it’s a signature achievement for all parties involved.

 

Tinnitus: Current Neuroscience Research and Theories was conducted by Amber Leaver PhD, who is a post-doctoral research fellow at Georgetown; and she taught us a lot, treating us as she would a class of grad students, and not dumbing it down. The only downside is that neither of the two recent treatments — Neuromonics or Widex Zen.

Our friend Bonnie O’Leary at Northern Virginia Resource Center (NVRC) took copious notes and emailed her Seminar report to Members; however, since the link has not yet been posted to their HLAA Convention Reports page, I am pasting Mrs O’Learys’ report below:

NVRC News – June 22, 2011

Tinnitus:  Current Neuroscience Research and Theories

By: Bonnie O’Leary, 6/22/11

If you struggle with tinnitus, you are not alone.  There are over 46 million people in this country who have some form of this often debilitating condition.  This tinnitus workshop was presented by Amber M. Leaver, PhD, who got involved with tinnitus research at Georgetown University’s [sic] Medical Center two years ago.  I thank her for providing notes from her power point to assist us in our report.

Dr. Leaver began the workshop with some background on tinnitus.  It is a common hearing disorder in which a person hears a “phantom sensation” of sounds in the ear – buzzing or ringing are the most common – even though no external sound is present.  Tinnitus can come and go, it can bother us
for long periods of time, or it can be present constantly.  Groups at high risk for developing tinnitus include those who are exposed to loud noise: construction workers, musicians, and military personnel.  More military veterans receive  compensation for tinnitus and hearing loss than for any other medical issue.

Tinnitus can be associated with difficulty sleeping and fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression, and other factors.

Causes of tinnitus

The exact cause of tinnitus is unknown, but there are triggers to watch out for.  The  most common is exposure to loud noise and resulting hearing loss.  Head or neck injury, temporomandibular joint/jaw dysfunction (TMJ), and certain drugs are other triggers.  However, not everyone with hearing loss or head injury develops chronic tinnitus, and this is a phenomenon that neuroscience research is attempting to understand.  To understand tinnitus, we need to understand how the brains of people with tinnitus are different from those without tinnitus.

Neuroscience research

How does tinnitus affect the brain?  Currently, research identifies changes in two parts of tinnitus patients’ brains: the auditory system and the limbic system.

The auditory system begins in the ear, where sound is converted to neural impulses which travel to the auditory sensory processing center, or the auditory cortex.  People with tinnitus have hyper-responsiveness to sound in their auditory cortex, especially sounds like their tinnitus sensation.  In all people, the auditory cortex contains tissue that’s organized by what pitch it responds to best, like a keyboard on the brain. This is called tonotopy.

When we lose our hearing, these “brain keyboards” are missing “keys” corresponding to the hearing loss, and they also have extra “keys” corresponding to pitches close to their hearing loss.  In tinnitus sufferers, these extra keys often match the tinnitus sensation, and it is thought that the imbalances in hyperactivity and tonotopy produce the tinnitus sensation.  What is unclear is whether these changes are due to hearing damage or to tinnitus itself, making it hard to prove that changes to the auditory system alone cause tinnitus.

The limbic system is considered the emotional part of the brain, but it has also shown to be involved in deciding the value of our thoughts and behaviors.  The limbic system seems to be different in people with tinnitus due to a section of the brain being structured differently than in people without tinnitus.

Similar differences in this part of the brain are found in people with depression and chronic pain.  Dr. Leaver and her colleagues propose that this part of the limbic system works like a noise-cancellation system. When this system doesn’t work well, people are not able to suppress unimportant thoughts and perceptions – including phantom perceptions like tinnitus.

The impact of research on the development of treatments for tinnitus

As many of us know, there is currently no cure for tinnitus, and there is no treatment that works for everyone.  It will be crucial to identify the brain basis of tinnitus to develop effective treatments.  If the brain basis is mostly auditory, then treatments should target the auditory system.  If, on the other hand, the brain basis is limbic, then treatments will have to target the limbic system.

To learn more, Dr. Leaver directed us to the website for the American Tinnitus Association.

However, the highlight for me was meeting Miss Katie-louise Bailey, who came all the way from Derby, England for an action-packed week here in America with her friend Anna Herriman. For those who don’t (yet) know her, Katie-louise is a star soccer player who played for the England Deaf Ladies football team in international tournaments as well as University of Derby; and she is also one of UK’s top 250cc motocross racers, riding  for the Kawasaki factory team. Besides being a well-known athlete who just happens to be hearing impaired, she is also quite a role model for deaf & HOH young adults in the Derby & Nottingham region, across England, and around the globe, with her leading by example… And I’m proud to call her my friend.

Given the size of the crowd, all went surprisingly well, with the only real glitch Sunday at the Awards Breakfast when the adjacent session of the (Wired To Fail) Loop Conference bled into the banquet room, raining on Joe Gordons’ parade as he received a Lifetime Advocacy Achievement Award for his captioning advocacy. Other than that hiccup (which was Ampetronics’ fault), Convention Director Nancy Macklin indeed did a very good job with the largest HLAA convention in history.

Footnotes:

1: IEEE = Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers, of which yours truly is also a Member.

2: TIA = Telecommunications Industry Association

Powered by WordPress